Action on Climate Change

Disclosure Based on TCFD Recommendations
In order to ensure we have a concrete understanding of the risks and opportunities that climate change will have on our business, we undertake scenario analysis.
In our scenario analysis, we assume two scenarios—a 1.5°C one and a 4°C one—set out below, identify the risks and opportunities that may impact our business by the year 2030, and assess the extent of this impact.
Strategy
In order to ensure we have a concrete understanding of the risks and opportunities that climate change will have on our business, we have undertaken scenario analysis. We assumed two scenarios: a 1.5°C scenario and a 4°C. Having identified the risks and opportunities that may impact our business by the year 2030 and assessed the extent of this impact, we then investigated measures to be taken.
We envisage that the main risks and opportunities for the Tsubakimoto Group in the 1.5°C scenario will come from changing customer needs as society as a whole transitions to decarbonization. We expect that there will be a reduction in demand for some Tsubakimoto products, such as those for internal combustion engines and fossil fuel-related products, while on the other hand, we also envisage that there will be factors that can be expected to have a positive effect on our business, such as transition-driven demand for EV-related products, renewable energy-related products, and logistics-related products. It is assumed that a carbon tax will be introduced (140 euros in 2030), in which case risk factors may include increased burden for energy purchasing (electricity, gasoline, etc.) and an increase in supply costs due to an increase in the cost of raw materials for the products we offer. We see the shift in customer needs as a business opportunity to increase the number of products we offer that support the transition to a decarbonized society. With regard to the introduction of a carbon tax, we are going to handle this through measures that include the use of renewable energy and the switching of company vehicles to EV.
For the 4°C scenario, we mainly assessed physical risks and identified the additional risk factors of impacts on our facilities, inventory, and other such assets as a result of increasingly strong typhoons, flooding caused by heavy rain, and other such weather events, impacts on supplies and sales due to factors such as the fragmenting of the supply chain, and decreased labor productivity due to a rise in average temperatures. We are going to cover the risks including the risk of damage from wind and rain through insurance or other such means. With regard to the impact on the supply chain, we will address this in cooperation with our business partners.
We believe that the resilience of the Group’s business against climate change risks is ensured under both scenarios. We will continue to address climate change through scenario analysis and refined evaluation of financial impact, and through the incorporation of actual risks, opportunities, and response measures in management plans.
Scenario analysis conditions and definitions
Scenario | Outlook | Reference scenario |
---|---|---|
1.5°C scenario | Strict policies are enacted toward the achievement of net-zero carbon emissions by 2025, a target which will achieve sustainability in society, and innovation in technology progresses. Temperature increase remains stable below 1.5°C at the end of the 21st century. |
|
4°C scenario | Currently enacted policies continue, and no additional measures are taken. Temperature increase exceeds 2°C at the end of the 21st century, and major impacts from climate change are felt. |
|
Impact |
---|
Large: Major impact on the Company Medium: Limited impact on the Company Small: Minimal impact on the Company |
Impact Timing |
---|
Near term: Within 1-2 years Medium term: Within 5 years Long term: Within 20 years |
Risks and opportunities identified through scenario analysis, and planned actions
Categories of opportunities & risks | Scenario | Issue | Specific impact on the Group | Impact | Impact Timing | Measures | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Transition Risks | Policy/legislation | 1.5°C | Introduction of carbon tax | Increase in heating and lighting expenses at offices and fuel costs for sales vehicles due to the introduction of a carbon tax | Small | Near- to medium term |
|
Strengthening of obligation to report emissions | Increase in compliance costs, such as third-party certification costs for GHG emissions | Small | Near- to medium term |
|
|||
Recycling regulations |
|
Large | Medium-term |
|
|||
Technology | Advancement of next-generation technologies |
|
Small | Near- to medium term |
|
||
Markets | Rising costs of raw materials | Increase in costs due to a shift to renewable raw materials | Large | Medium-term |
|
||
Reputation | Change in reputation among customers and investors |
|
- | Medium-term |
|
||
Physical Risks | Acute | 4°C | Extreme weather (intensification of natural disasters) | Sales decline due to supply chain disruptions, stalled sales activities, and factory shutdowns or production cutbacks at customer sites caused by large-scale natural disasters | Small | Medium- to long-term |
|
Inventory and other owned assets damaged by floods or other such disasters | Medium | Medium- to long-term |
|
||||
Chronic | Rise in average temperature | Deterioration in worker efficiency due to deterioration of the working environment caused by rising temperatures | Medium | Medium- to long-term |
|
||
Opportunities | Resource efficiency | 1.5°C/ 4°C |
Streamlining of logistics/production | Reduced energy usage through inventory base reorganization and logistics streamlining | Small | Medium-term |
|
Energy sources | Energy saving/decarbonization | Reduced energy costs through switching sales vehicles to EV or other eco-friendly cars | Small | Near- to medium term |
|
||
Products and services | Development and growth of low-carbon emission products due to factors including changes in consumer and customer preferences |
|
Large | Near- to medium term |
|
||
Markets | Change in customer and investor behavior |
|
- | Medium-term |
|
Example of calculation of financial impact
Scenario | Assumptions | Financial impact |
---|---|---|
1.5°C scenario |
Carbon pricing in 2030: 140 USD/tCO2 (Source: “World Energy Outlook 2024” by IEA) |
Cost of approximately 15 million yen |
4°C scenario |
Labor productivity decline due to heat stress in 2030: 1.8% (Source: “Climate Impact Explorer” by Climate Analytics) |
Increase in personnel expenses of approximately 100 million yen |
Organizational strategy resilience taking into account different climate-related scenarios that include scenarios of 2°C or lower
With the aforementioned actions, we believe that the resilience of the Group’s business against climate change risks is ensured under both the 1.5°C and 4°C scenarios. We will continue to address climate change through scenario analysis and refined evaluation of financial impact, and through the incorporation of actual risks, opportunities, and response measures in management plans.
Transition Plan/Roadmap/Action Plan for Decarbonization
Current
2050
Target | 50% reduction in GHG emissions by 2030 | Carbon neutrality by 2050 |
---|---|---|
GHG emission reduction |
Initiatives in offices
|
|
Initiatives through company vehicles
|
||
Initiatives in the supply chain
|
||
Effective use of resources |
Initiatives toward a circular economy
|
|
Business transition |
Initiatives toward sustainability and decarbonized products
|
|
Market appraisal |
Disclosure of sustainability information
|
|
Adapting to climate change |
Continuous risk assessment
|
|
Creation of a comfortable working environment
|
|
Governance
Sustainability issues, including climate change, are discussed by the Sustainability Promotion Committee, and important matters are escalated to the Board of Directors after first being examined by the Board of Corporate Management. Risks and opportunities related to climate change are identified, analyzed, and assessed on the basis of scenario analysis.
(See sustainability governance)
Risk Management
In the Group, Sustainability Promotion Execution Teams take the lead in identifying and assessing sustainability-related risks and analyzing opportunities. Among sustainability-related risks and opportunities, the risks and opportunities related to climate change are identified, analyzed, and assessed on the basis of scenario analysis. Important risks and opportunities that have been identified and assessed are reported by the Sustainability Promotion Committee to the Board of Directors and the Board of Corporate Management as required, ensuring information on risks and opportunities is shared. At the same time, appropriate measures against risks are considered, and opportunities are incorporated, as necessary, into management strategies and issues to be addressed. Specifically, among sustainability-related risks, the risks related to management strategy and business operations are deliberated on by the Board of Corporate Management and the Board of Directors as necessary. Cooperation with the Risk Management Committee will be requested as and when required, all the while efforts are made to avoid the materialization of such risk events and consideration is given to measures to be taken if they do materialize. The Sustainability Promotion Committee also takes the lead with regard to opportunities and supports the initiatives of each business division. Regarding opportunities related to climate change, we are working to expand sales opportunities by developing new products, such as those related to decarbonization, that meet customer needs.
Indicators and Targets
The Group uses its GHG emissions (Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions at all domestic bases of the Group) as metrics for assessing risks and opportunities related to climate change. The trend of the Group’s GHG emissions is as follows, and while fiscal 2024 saw the achievement of a 25.8% reduction compared to fiscal 2013, emissions have been in an upward trend since fiscal 2023 due to an increase in activities at each base. We aim to reduce the Group’s GHG emissions by 50% from the fiscal 2013 level by fiscal 2030 and to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050 through various decarbonization initiatives such as the use of renewable energy.
Since fiscal 2023, we have calculated and monitored emissions in our supply chain (Scope 3) in addition to our own emissions (Scope 1 and Scope 2). While it was regrettable that emissions rose in fiscal 2024 due to factors that include the completion of large-scale facility construction and equipment installation work, we will continue to improve the accuracy of Scope 3 calculations and consider Scope 3 reduction targets.
(GHG emissions: Scopes 1 and 2 reduction targets and actual results)
Emissions (t-CO2) | Reduction rate (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Scope 1 (Note 1) |
Scope 2 (Note 2) |
|||
Fiscal 2013 (actual) |
1,293 | 710 | 583 | - |
Fiscal 2021 (actual) |
968 | 513 | 456 | 25.1 |
Fiscal 2022 (actual) |
928 | 533 | 395 | 28.2 |
Fiscal 2023 (actual) |
939 | 537 | 402 | 26.9 |
Fiscal 2024 (actual) |
960 | 562 | 398 | 25.8 |
Scope 1 is defined as the direct emissions of greenhouse gases emitted by the Group itself. Therefore, it is calculated from the fuel consumption (gasoline, diesel oil, heavy oil, city gas, LPG) at all domestic bases of the Group.
Scope 2 is defined as the indirect emissions associated with the use of electricity, heat, and steam supplied by other companies. Therefore, it is calculated from the electricity consumption at all domestic bases of the Group.
(GHG emissions: Scope 3 actual results)
Category | Emissions (t-CO2) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Fiscal 2023 | Fiscal 2024 | ||
Scope 3 (Note 3) |
1. Purchased goods & services | 531,315 | 570,580 |
2. Capital goods | 1,953 | 2,070 | |
3. Fuel- and energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2) | 200 | 204 | |
4. Upstream transportation & distribution | 637 | 873 | |
5. Waste generated in operations | 265 | 305 | |
6. Business travel | 1,811 | 1,603 | |
7. Employee commuting | 251 | 276 | |
11. Use of sold products | 217,220 | 294,244 | |
Total | 753,651 | 870,155 |
Scope 3 is defined as emissions from other companies in the supply chain other than Scope 1 and Scope 2. Therefore, the emissions from other companies resulting from the activities of the Group (including overseas) are calculated by category.
Total support for on-site issues with
100 years of experience in corporate technology.